When he isn’t visitor internet hosting MSNBC’s The Cross Connection, Jason Johnson is a politics and journalism professor at Morgan State College, which doesn’t encourage confidence within the subsequent technology of journalists as he warned on Saturday of “catastrophic implications” of the Supreme Courtroom’s 6-3 conservative stability and condemned Sen. Mitch McConnell for not permitting President Biden to pack the Courtroom.

Johnson’s monologue was the results of a query from a viewer questioning what “we” should do to make the Courtroom extra “truthful and balanced” and consultant of the “various nation through which we dwell.”

 

 

Johnson started by warning viewers that whereas many of the consideration is on President Biden and Congress, “the Courtroom plans to take up an abortion case that may have catastrophic implications for Roe v. Wade they usually’re weighing whether or not or contemplate a significant problem to affirmative motion in school emissions.” 

He knowledgeable the viewers that each one that must be completed to broaden the Courtroom is for Congress to go a legislation, which has been launched, however after all that’s unlikely, not as a result of it’s a bare energy seize, however as a result of McConnell is an obstructionist: 

In fact, saying Congress simply has to go a legislation is somewhat like saying in a few weeks in a health club I could be Simone Biles. Though there’s a invoice to broaden from 9 to 13 justices, it has little probability of success since you could be positive Mitch McConnell will do something not to provide President Biden an opportunity to nominate new justices and smash the conservative majority that Mitch has labored so, so arduous for.

Happening to point out simply how arduous McConnell has labored, Johnson falsely accused him of “stealing a Supreme Courtroom seat from President Biden [sic] when Justice Scalia died.” 

Clearly, Johnson meant to say Obama, however that slip-up was hardly the worst a part of the diatribe. He then went on to declare that the mere existence the allegations in opposition to Brett Kavanaugh ought to’ve been sufficient to sink his affirmation, “then by serving to getting a person accused of sexual misconduct onto the bench.”

Lastly, Johnson accused McConnell of “jamming via Amy Coney Barrett’s affirmation simply eight days earlier than the election of 2020.” 

Johnson then talked about that though there have been calls from the left to broaden the Courtroom, Biden has not endorsed such an motion, however has put collectively a fee to check, “structural modifications to America’s highest courtroom. Not solely altering the variety of justices however different strikes like, I do not know, imposing time period limits.”

Wrapping up, Johnson centered on the left’s relationship with Justice Breyer, “some progressives have shifted their focus to 82-year previous Justice Stephen Breyer, urging the liberal justice to step down now and make room for one among Biden’s picks, a youthful liberal justice who could be on the Courtroom for many years, maybe even the first black woman, imagine that.”

This phase was sponsored by Liberty Mutual.  

Here’s a transcript for the June 12 present:

MSNBC

The Cross Connection With Tiffany Cross

10:52 AM ET

JASON JOHNSON: With many of the consideration today on President Biden and Congress, we have realized that the Courtroom plans to take up an abortion case that may have catastrophic implications for Roe v. Wade they usually’re weighing whether or not or contemplate a significant problem to affirmative motion in school emissions. So, the subject of the Courtroom’s composition and ideological stability is essential particularly since they have a 6-3 conservative majority. The authorized course of for altering the variety of justices on the Supreme Courtroom is fairly easy, Congress simply has to go a legislation, which it did most lately again in 1869 setting the Courtroom’s membership at its present restrict of 9. In fact, saying Congress simply has to go a legislation is somewhat like saying in a few weeks in a health club I could be Simone Biles. Though there’s a invoice to broaden from 9 to 13 justices, it has little probability of success since you could be positive Mitch McConnell will do something not to provide President Biden an opportunity to nominate new justices and smash the conservative majority that Mitch has labored so, so arduous for. First, by stealing a Supreme Courtroom seat from President Biden when Justice Scalia died, then by serving to getting a person accused of sexual misconduct onto the bench, then by jamming via Amy Coney Barrett’s affirmation simply eight days earlier than the election of 2020. You may do not forget that round Barrett’s affirmation the calls for the subsequent Democratic president to broaden the Courtroom had been getting louder, however Biden demurred, saying he quote “wasn’t a fan of the concept of truly increasing the Courtroom” and refused to return down strongly a method or one other. This April he created a 36 member chamber, not the Wu-tang Clan, however a fee to examine attainable structural modifications to America’s highest courtroom. Not solely altering the variety of justices however different strikes like, I do not know, imposing time period limits. The fee had its first public assembly three weeks in the past, outlining their bylaws and arising with a schedule of hearings later this summer season. Within the meantime some progressives have shifted their focus to 82-year previous Justice Stephen Breyer, urging the liberal justice to step down now and make room for one among Biden’s picks, a youthful liberal justice who could be on the Courtroom for many years, maybe even the primary black lady, think about that. You possibly can guess Tiffany and the group will probably be maintaining an in depth eye on each new improvement.